mullows
Welcome to WKXP Mullows radio. All blog all the time. We're taking your calls now so please post.
The Liberal Media Strikes Again
Damn that liberal media. I hate when they twist words into entirely new meanings. Take poor Pat Robertson, for instance. Perhaps you've heard of him. He's the Christian Evangelist and host of "The 700 Club." That damn liberal media took his comments completely out of context. At least, that's what he said when he accused the Associated Press of, "misinterpreting his remarks." Maybe we should decide for ourselves:
His actual words were in regard to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. He said, “You know, I don’t know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war, and I don’t think any oil shipments will stop.”
He then went on to say, “We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don’t need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It’s a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.”
The Associated Press dared to accuse dear Mr. Robertson, an honorable man of God, of calling for the death of a fellow human being.
Rightfully outraged by this horrendous stretch of truth, Robertson defended himself by saying, "I didn't say 'assassination.’ I said our special forces should ’take him out.' 'Take him out' could be a number of things including kidnapping."
You're right, Patter. 'Taking out' could mean a lot of thing, and I suppose kidnapping isn't a crime or a sin. But that isn't the point. You also said, "if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it." It pretty hard to misconstrue that. That means you think we should assassinate him. There's no way around it.
You can't blame the media when the remarks you made were caught on videotape. Maybe you should pray to God for a brain. Or ask your followers to "contribue" their hard earned money for one.
His actual words were in regard to Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. He said, “You know, I don’t know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war, and I don’t think any oil shipments will stop.”
He then went on to say, “We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability. We don’t need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator. It’s a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with.”
The Associated Press dared to accuse dear Mr. Robertson, an honorable man of God, of calling for the death of a fellow human being.
Rightfully outraged by this horrendous stretch of truth, Robertson defended himself by saying, "I didn't say 'assassination.’ I said our special forces should ’take him out.' 'Take him out' could be a number of things including kidnapping."
You're right, Patter. 'Taking out' could mean a lot of thing, and I suppose kidnapping isn't a crime or a sin. But that isn't the point. You also said, "if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it." It pretty hard to misconstrue that. That means you think we should assassinate him. There's no way around it.
You can't blame the media when the remarks you made were caught on videotape. Maybe you should pray to God for a brain. Or ask your followers to "contribue" their hard earned money for one.
Vincefile
Days of the Week That I Hate Uncle Nasty
Stalkers
The Best Sites on the Internet
Long Time Callers
- Quick questions, ladies and gentlemen: When reading a word in a "foreign language"...
... - the same way Bill Engvall thinks. Watch 15° off cool and you'll be in the know.
... - Most of you know me from the beginning or close to it. Some of...
...
politics